How to Avoid Burning Bridges

On Thursday, I finally received a response to a job application I had submitted early last year:

Elaine,
Thank you for your interest in the post-doctoral position in my group. Are you available for a 1 hr phone interview sometime tomorrow or Monday?
Please let me know.
Thanks.

Dr. Xyz
Big Stupid Company

No apologies for the ridiculous delay; it was as though he had just come across my application last week. Shall I suppose his company receives so many job applications that there is a 15-month lag to respond? Does he think I remained unemployed in anticipation this whole time?

I send out many requests that disappear into the ether. I wondered why people didn’t just take 5 seconds to reply with a Sorry not interested.

We think that a complete disregard of queries implies that we’re so busy we don’t have the five seconds to respond. But the senders know better by now.

Sorry not interested burns bridges. Complete disregard actually means Not interested at the moment, but might possibly be interested in the future so I don’t want to risk saying something to offend you*.

Here’s what my prospective employer really meant to say:

Elaine,
Thank you for your interest. You were useless to me for the past 15 months, but now that I need something you can do, I’ll be nice and give you the courtesy of a response.

Dr. Xyz

I’m going to ignore it, of course. A part of me wants to reply and tell him where to stick it, but I remember there was a time when I desperately wanted that job. And maybe in a couple years I’ll find myself broke and homeless with staggering medical bills and I’ll have no choice but to reply:

Dear Dr. Xyz,
Thank you for your kind response. I had so many messages in my inbox that it took me two years to delete all the Cialis ads and get to your email. Yes, I am indeed available for a phone interview.

Call me!
Elaine

*On a side note, if people are ignoring your queries for thoughtful response, it is possible that you simply suck at email.

The Tragedy of Captive-Bred Humans

Chinatown turtle

My turtle was always climbing out of his glass bowl. I had purchased him in Chinatown for $5 and named him Dribble. Being a turtle, he couldn’t run very fast, so I usually found him walking around in my dorm room.

I felt bad that Dribble wanted to escape. I put decorative rocks in his bowl and fed him live goldfish to cheer him up. I even went back to Chinatown and bought a second turtle so that he could have a girlfriend. He used Turtle #2 as a step stool to climb out of the bowl even faster. I suspected that he was clinically depressed.

I took both turtles to Caltech’s Throop pond and released them into the wild where they could live happily ever after. Turtles don’t like to be cage animals.

Caltech Throop Pond

No creature does. Most heartbreaking is the life of a caged human. Human enclosures are not built with metal bars or glass tanks, but constructed from paychecks, material comforts, and external expectations.

The only vague awareness that a human has of his confinement is a general dissatisfaction with life. He has no idea that his cramped living condition is the source of his misery, because he doesn’t even know that there is a world outside his cage.

He may attribute his unhappiness to depression or some anxiety disorder. But there is nothing clinically wrong with the human. He’s just stuck inside a crappy cage.

Not surprisingly, wretched living conditions induce unpleasant behavior. In the wild, pigs are naturally clean creatures who socialize by grooming each other. But in the oppressive confines of a factory farm, pigs will act aggressively and bite each other’s tails off. Similarly, humans raised on cubicle farms behave like assholes to other humans. Humans are not inherently selfish pricks; they are merely lashing out in response to the frustration of imprisonment.

Pigs on sanctuary

Miserable humans may attempt to improve their living conditions by adorning their cages with expensive objects like cars or houses or Patek Philippe watches. These decorations only further obscure the view outside. Also, they block the emergency exits. The human grows more despondent.

Sometimes humans will bring other humans into the cage to keep them company. This can temporarily distract from awareness of captivity. A good companion can even be an accomplice to executing an escape. But a poorly-chosen mate will crowd the enclosure and act as a fire hazard during the evacuation process.

The reintroduction of captive-bred humans into the wild is necessary to ensure the survival of our species. This need not be difficult. The truth is, most humans already possess the skills to survive independently. What they lack is belief in their own abilities, because they spend their lives only exposed to other shackled animals on the factory farm.

Near the end of life, humans have their cages forcibly removed as external pressures vaporize and material wealth is stripped away. Tragically, it is only at this point that cage-humans realize captivity was always an illusion – they kept themselves confined by choice all along.

sunset_flight

The Winklevoss Twins are Launching a Bitcoin ETF

winklevoss twins bitcoin

Can’t be a worse investment than the Facebook IPO, right? Takedown from the Macro Man:

It’s an IQ test. Bitcoin is anonymous, untaxed (for now) and quite liquid in and of its own right despite all the complexities of a cryptocurrency. A bitcoin ETF is taxed, has fees, may or may not be liquid at all.

To be fair, physical gold is anonymous and quite liquid. Does that mean GLD is an IQ test?

See Also:
The Winklevoss Twins Would Like To Help You Trade Bitcoins With Their Bitcoin ETF –business insider

Some Things are TOO HARD

Warren Buffett office

Warren Buffett has been using this same office for over 50 years, and it probably looks much the same as when he first moved in. Buffett has an old-fashioned newspaper on his desk — I think that’s where he gets his stock quotes every morning. Maybe he still quotes his share prices in fractions.

He has a tray on his desk labeled “TOO HARD”. Charlie Munger has one too. If Warren Buffett owned a computer, it would sit in that tray.

Just kidding.

The “TOO HARD” tray always bothered me because I thought it meant that Buffett had given up on learning. This is not the case.

Buffett avoids technology stocks, but not because he doesn’t understand technology. He avoids investing in tech companies because he is a long-term investor, and he acknowledges that he cannot understand the predictability of the tech landscape in the long term.

Here’s how they explain it:
Charlie Munger says, “It’s not a competency if you don’t know the edge of it.”
Buffett says, “When ‘dumb’ money acknowledges its limitations, it ceases to be dumb.”

Being aware of what you don’t know is more valuable than being aware of what you do know.

It’s not that they gave up on learning, it’s that they recognize there is so much left to learn. Many things in life are TOO HARD right now. Identifying what those things are is the first step to making them NOT-TOO-HARD in the future.

See Also:
Hagstrom, R. The Essential Buffett: Timeless Principles for the New Economy. Wiley & Sons, 2001.